• 01
  • 02
  • 03
  • 04
  • 05
  • 06
  • 07
  • 08
  • 09
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13

Short Communication



ReAttach Therapy International Foundation
Waalre, The Netherlands
Received: 23-June-2018
Revised: 26-June-2018
Accepted: 27-June-2018
Online first 28-June-2018



When a mother of a one-year old child asks her child to rest, it will be very difficult, if not impossible for the child to obey. Imagine an experiment with 30 mothers and children of the same age and it will not be difficult to picture that completing this task would be too difficult for those children. It is self-evident that humans with a certain developmental stage can’t follow the instruction to rest. If we are ignorant about human development, we may draw preliminary conclusions and design research hypotheses to investigate what could be wrong with these children. What distinguishes this category of normal children? Do they speak another language? Are they deaf? Do they have different brains? We might consider it will have something to do with their age, but this factor will not completely explain the problem.
We are dealing with the fact that there is no timetable for development, no direct route or highway: developmental outcome seems rather unpredictable and dynamic with big leaps forward and periods of relapse or decline.

The concept ‘autism spectrum disorder (ASD)’ as described in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) refers to a complex and heterogeneous area of clinical characteristics based on behaviour and obtaining developmental milestones. Spectrum refers to a range of developmental disorders varying from mild to severe, compared with normal controls. The spectrum also refers to considerable individual varieties in health problems and difficulties in social interaction, motor coordination and daily life functioning. Although we can hardly describe one phenotype, the difference between individuals with ASD and normal controls is used in many scientific studies.

Is it autism we investigated or are there plausible alternate phenomena responsible for our findings?

The assumption that a group of individuals, once diagnosed with ASD by the DSM-5, can be clearly distinguished from normal controls might be a potentially flawed decision. Results reflecting differences between these groups confirm the bias that individuals diagnosed with ASD actually have different brains or brain functioning, which might be based on established research finding but might be wrong essentially.

Consider the complexity of brain functioning and this complex system is fallible: it can easily be deceived. This happens when we pay too much attention to potential threats, by our tendency to predictability, or by a state of hypo-arousal (fatigue, attention deficits, medicine). If we can accept the unpredictability of our state of mind it will be very hard to assume that the state of mind of individuals with ASD will be predictable.

The concept “Autism Spectrum Disorders” refers to a static model: a pervasive developmental disorder refers to malfunction of development that will continue to impact individuals lives. Questioning this model opens the door for ulterior possibilities such as an individual symptomatology network to create tailored interventions (Nuijten, 2016) or a dynamic developmental model such as ReAttach (Weerkamp Bartholomeus, 2018) in combination with other necessary interventions: for instance, supporting the immunity system (Poletaev, 2018) (Trajkovski V. , 2016), family support (Sarria, 2015) (Preece, 2017) or medical care. Effective early interventions (Dawson, 2008) (Smith, 2015) (Trajkovski, 2016) and reversing early core ASD characteristics into normal development by change of food or medical care (Poletaev, 2018) support a dynamic ortho-pedagogical model rather than a static autism spectrum disorder diagnose which might have a negative impact on parental and personal expectations and developmental outcome (Duijkers, 2014).

A dynamic special education model: ReAttach

ReAttach is a multimodal intervention based on ortho-pedagogical influencing obstructing factors and facilitating optimal conditions for growth (Weerkamp Bartholomeus, 2018). From an ortho-pedagogical point of view arousal regulation, joint attention, activation of the social reward system and multiple sensory processing are prior to conceptualisation. The monotropic information processing and lack of coherency individuals with ASD experience in daily life, can be interpreted as a normal state of mind as we see in the pre-conceptual stage. This is the stage prior to the conceptual stage, when individuals will develop a coherent concept of the self and learn to differentiate between the self and (significant) others (Feldman, 2007). Instead of completing this multisensory (Baum, 2015) (Kwakye, 2011) (Wallace, 2014) integrative task toward coherency in terms of self-awareness, individuals with ASD will continue to process information in a monotropic way (Bogdashina, 2004). The monotropic information processing offers some strengths (hyper-focus on details) but also a lot of difficulties in daily life functioning which are guiding for treatment goals and evaluation of interventions as reflected in the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (Rimland, 1991).
People tend to regress in development when they are blown away by overdemands, sensory overload, medical problems or when they are exposed to more stressful experiences than they can deal with (Seifer, 1992) (Wentz, 2005). Such a decline in development can be temporary and fortunately many individuals have the resilience to continue their developmental on their own. Unfortunately, other individuals develop more severe problems and loose previously achieved milestones or develop a vulnerability for future pathology (Poletaev, 2018) (Di Pierro, 2017) (Mito, 2014) (Wentz, 2005). A lot of overlapping symptomatology between ASD and other clinical neuropsychiatric disorders has been found, for instance between ASD and Generalized Social Anxiety Disorder (Cath, 2008), ADHD (Alley, 2016) (Anholt, 2010) Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (Arildskov, 2015) (Paula-Perez, 2013) (Jacob, 2009), Schizophrenia (Fitzgerald M. , 2012), Eating Disorders (Dell’Osso, 2016), Personality Disorders (Baskin-Sommers, 2014) and Psychopathy (Fitzgerald M. , 2015) (Rogers, 2006).
Preliminary results in treatment of aspects of autism and overlapping symptomatology by ReAttach, support the hypothesis of a dynamic ortho-pedagogical model (Weerkamp Bartholomeus, 2018). Through offering optimal information processing conditions and activating personal development, core symptomatology networks declined and a broad range of patients with neuropsychiatric conditions including ASD was able to grow and/or reclaim previously lost developmental milestones (Weerkamp Bartholomeus, 2018).

Evaluation of research conditions from a dynamic special education model

Social communication problems are one of the core characteristics of ASD: individuals with autism will commonly be delayed in language and communication skills can be very different from neuro-typical children (Fitzgerald M. , 2017). Due to the epidemic growth of autism (Poletaev, 2018) many parents who have a child with social communication problems seek help and visit a clinician for a diagnose. How likely is it that these parents are worried and pay too much attention to the potential threat that there might be something wrong with their child?
It is likely that this causes parental stress which is known to affect the child whose stress levels will rise too (Weerkamp Bartholomeus, 2015).
Hyperarousal of parents will trigger the anxiety system which will change the way the brain of the child is functioning and monotropic information processing, lack of coherency, poor communication skills and poor performance on tasks requiring multiple sensory processing will at least temporary interfere (Cath, 2008) (Seifer, 1992). Presenting a child under these conditions to a clinician is likely to confirm that something is wrong with this child. Every child at risk for diagnose deserves a clinician with excellent external arousal regulation skills who can facilitate the child to function well during neuropsychological and social communication tasks. Optimal information processing starts with external arousal regulation by parents, by teachers, clinicians, therapists and researchers. Reviewing research conditions by changing the perspective from a static diagnostic model towards a dynamic ortho-pedagogical might offer new insights or plausible alternate accounts for the results.

Review Study: Overt social interaction and resting state in autism (Jasmin, 2018)

Recently a study was published about overt social interaction and resting state in autism (Jasmin, 2018) in which a group of 19 males with ASD and 20 control participants were compared. There were no significant differences found in full-scale IQ, verbal IQ and age. The researchers investigated the neural basis of face-to-face interactions under two conditions and resting states. The conditions of the face-to-face interactions were:

  1. Conversation (spontaneous speech)
  2. Repetition (repeating the speech of their partner)

Prior to scanning, participants were told that they would engage in unstructured and informal conversations with the experimenter.

Unstructured and informal conversations are unpredictable demanding tasks for individuals with social communication problems. This instruction will alter the state of mind of those individuals with ASD who have difficulty with unpredictability in general and/or who have traits of perfectionism.
Special interests: A modified version of the Interest Scale questionnaire (Anthony, 2013) (Bodfish, 2003) was used to rate participants level of interest in various topics and to indicate the top three interest, from which the experimenter selected two (Jasmin, 2018).
The choice to communicate about two interests from the top three of favourite subjects is interesting to review. If we love to talk about something this will bring excitement and reward in terms of joy (Marazziti, 2006). It will alter the state of mind of those individuals who find spontaneous social communication stressful or demanding when they hear they can talk about their favourite subjects. When there are individuals with preoccupations in the group diagnosed with ASD brain-activity during this conversation will reflect the obsessive compulsiveness of talking about this beloved subject and counteracting the anxiety of the social conversation into excitement and joy (Marazziti, 2006).

Final conversation: cognitive compensation?
The final conversation was about work or school life (according age of the participant).
Although the spontaneous part of this final conversation might be demanding, the subject work or school life is a common subject. Many individuals with ASD who are verbal and bright learn how to deal with questions about their work or school. From the pre-conceptual developmental stage of ASD, which goes with mono-information processing and fragmented speech, it will take more effort to solve challenging task that require social concepts and oversight. Cognitive compensation (Mizuno, 2006) (Jasmin, 2018) might indeed play a major role in the final conversation task, besides previous training.

Repetitive Speech
In the pre-conceptual stage, children and adults train their working memory since they rely on sequences. Repetitive speech is a predictable task and a strength for many individuals with an autism spectrum condition. Those individuals who are very good at it, or love to perform such a task will show excitement and alter their state of mind. For other individuals the predictability of this task and the lack of need for cognitive compensation will be a distraction caused by the mono-information processing (Bogdashina, 2004). As long as they are busy completing this task there is literally no room for something else (like distress).

Resting States
Each run began with 16 seconds of rests during which the participant saw the word “REST”.
After each interaction, a “STOP” slide was displayed to the participant, followed by 30 seconds of rest
(Jasmin, 2018).
Both instructions can’t be generalized as clear instructions for a heterogenous group of individuals diagnosed with ASD. Rest is an abstract concept and from my clinical experience with autism it is most difficult to explain the concept “rest” as well as the concept “stop”. In this context they both mean that the conversation is over and that the participant should relax.
From a pre-conceptual stage it will be rather unpredictable how an individual will respond on these instructions. Individuals who have preoccupations will probably show a lot of activity engaging in thinking about their favourite subjects: this will alter their state of mind. The individuals with ASD who tend to be under-aroused in general (Anholt, 2010), might stimulate themselves by seeking sensory input (Bogdashina, 2004). Others might feel tense because the concept ‘rest’ is an insecure state of mind for those who can’t follow this command. This might activate anxiety and restlessness (Cath, 2008).

The purpose of the study of Jasmin et al was to characterize neural activity during spontaneous conversation in autism and resting states (Jasmin, 2018). Reviewing this study from the perspective of a dynamic ortho-pedagogical model might contribute to the discussion of the findings in a positive critical way.
Researchers state that many results were state-dependent: neural regions that were hyper correlated during tasks appeared to function at typical levels or were hypo-correlated during rest (Jasmin, 2018). They discuss the possibility of increased functional connectivity at task in the ASD group as a compensatory neural strategy (Shen, 2012) which corresponds to with our findings. Researchers question the static model themselves: “Why did our autistic participants receive diagnoses if they are able to compensate and function at nearly normal levels?” (Jasmin, 2018). The dynamic ortho-pedagogical model might answer this question by emphasizing the unpredictability of developmental outcome and the consequences of a static ASD diagnose. Considering both the ASD group and the neurotypical group to contain individuals that function in a rather unpredictable way, with varying states of minds due to many possible reasons it is very difficult to support any conclusion at all.

As a recommendation for further research it would be interesting to embrace the complexity of symptomatology networks from a dynamic developmental model of our fascinating brain.

Author would like to thank the reviewers for the feedback and to Prof. Dr. Vladimir Trajkovski for stimulation of academic publishing in general.

Conflicts of interests
The author declares no conflict of interests.


Alley, C. (2016). The relationship between Psychopathy Traits, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder in Forensic Populations. Sociology and Anthropology, 4, 5, 380-407 DOI:10.13189/sa.2016.040511.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). DSM-5, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, D.C.

Anholt, G. (2010). Autism and ADHD symptoms in patients with OCS: are they associated with specific OC symptom dimensions or OC symptom severity? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 580-589 doi 10.1107/200787-015-0782-5.

Anthony, L. K. (2013). Interests in high-functioning autism are more intense, interfering and idiosyncratic than those in neurotypical development. Development and Psychopathology, 25:643-652.

Arildskov, T. (2015). Subclinial autism spectrum symptoms in pediatric obsessive compulsive disorder. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, DOI 10.117/220787-015-0782-5.

Baskin-Sommers, A. (2014). Empathy in Narcissistic Personality Disorders: from clinical and empirical perspectives. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research and Treatment, 5, 3, 323-333.

Baum, S. (2015). Behavioral, perceptual and neural alterations in sensory and multisensory function in autism spectrum disorder. Progress in Neurobiology, http://dx.doi.ort/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.09.007.

Bodfish, J. (2003). The interest scale.

Bogdashina, O. (2004). In Waarnemingen en zintuiglijke ervaringen bij mensen met autisme en Aspergersyndroom. Antwerpen: Garant.

Cath, D. (2008). Symptom overlap between autism spectrum disorder, generalized social anxiety disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder in adults: a preliminary case-controlled study. Psychopathology, 41, 101-110 doi. 1159/000111555.

Cuthbert, B. (2015). Research domain criteria: toward future psychiatric nosologies. Dialogues Cli Neuroscience, 17, 89-97.

Dawson, G. (2008). Early behavioral intervention, brain plasticity, and the prevention of autism spectrum disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 775-803.

Dell’Osso, L. (2016). Historical evolution of the concept of anorexia nervosa and relationships with orthorexia nervosa, autism and obsessive-compulsive spectrum. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 1651-1660.

Di Pierro, R. (2017). Investigating the relationship between narcissism and emotion regulation difficulties: the role of grandiose and vulnerable traits. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 14, 3, 209-215.

Duijkers, C. (2014). Social cognition in the differential diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders and personality disorders. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 11, 118-129.

E.L., W. (2005). Childhood onset neuropsychiatric disorders is adult eating disorder patients. Euro Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 14, 8, 431-437.

Feldman, R. (2007). Ontwikkelingspsychologie. In R. Feldman. Amsterdam: Pearson Education.

Fitzgerald, M. (2012). Schizophrenia and autism/aspergers’s syndrome overlap and difference. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 9,4, 171-176.

Fitzgerald, M. (2015). Autism and school Shootings – Overlap of Autism (Asperger’s Syndrome) and General Psychopathy. In M. Fitzgerald, Autism Spectrum Disorder – Recent Advances (p. doi: 10.5772/5882). InTech.

Fitzgerald, M. (2017). Autism – Paradigms, Recent Research and Clinical Applications. The Clinical Gestalts of Autism: Over 40 years of Clinical Experience with Autism.

Jacob, S. (2009). Autism Spectrum and obsessive-compulsive disorders: OC behaviors, phenotypes and genetics. Autism Research, 2, 283-311 doi.10.1103/aur.108.

Jasmin, K. G. (2018). Overt social interaction and resting state in autism: core and contextual neural features. bioRxiv,

Kwakye, L. (2011). Altered auditory and multisensory temporal processing in autism spectrum disorders. Front. Integr. Neurosc., 4, 129.

Marazziti, D. D. (2006). A relationship between oxytocin and anxiety of romantic attachment. Clin. Pract. Epidemol. Ment. Health, 11, 2-28.

Mito, H. (2014). The impact of elevated autism spectrum disorder traits on clinical and psychosocial features and long-term treatment outcome in adult patients with obsessive compulsive disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55, 1526-1533.

Mizuno, A. V. (2006). Partially enhanced thalamocortical functional connectivity in autism . Brain Research, 1104: 160-174.

Nuijten, M. (2016). Mental disorders as complex networks: an introduction and overview of a network approach to psychopathology. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 13, 4/5, 68-76.

Paula-Perez, I. (2013). Differential diagnosis between obsessive compulsive disorder and restrictive and repetitive behavioural patterns, activities and interests in autism spectrum disorder. Revista de Psyquiatria y Salud Mental, 6, 178-186.

Poletaev, A. S. (2018). Autism: genetics or epigenetics? In P. Weerkamp Bartholomeus, Autism: is there a place for ReAttach Therapy? (pp. 123 – 134). Rome: Giovanni Fioriti Editore.

Preece, D. T., Trajkovski, V. (2017). Parent education in autism spectrum disorder – A review of the literature. Hrvatska revija za rehabilitacijska istraživanja , Vol 53, br. 1, pp. 118-128.

Rimland, B. (1991). Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist. San Diego: Autism Research Institute.

Rogers, J. (2006). Autism spectrum disorder and psychopathy: shared cognitive underpinnings or double hit? Psychological Medicine, 1, 36, 12, 447-450.

Sarria, E. P. (2015). Coping Strategies and Parents’ Positive Perceptions of Raising a Child with Autism Spectrum Disorders. In M. Fitzgerald, Autism Spectrum Disorder – Recent Advances (pp. 51-79 Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.

Seifer, R. (1992). Child and family factors that ameliorate risk between 4 years and 13 years of age. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 893-903.

Shen, M. (2012). Atypical lexicosemantic function of extrastriate cortex in autism spectrum disorder: Evidence from functional and effective connectivity. NeuroImage, 62: 1780-1791.

Smith, T. K. (2015). Predicting outcome of community-based early intensive behavioral intervention for children with autism. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1271 – 1282.

Trajkovski, V. (2016). Immunogenetic aspects of autism spectrum disorders. Paediatr Croat, 60 (Supl 1): 84-89.

Trajkovski, V., Jurtoski, F. Early intervention in children with autism spectrum disorders in Republic of Macedonia. Early intervention in Special Education and Rehabilitation-thematic collection of international importance. October 14-16th, 2016, Subotica: c2016. 139-151.

Wallace, M. (2014). The construct of multisensory temporalbinding window and its dysregulation in developmental disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 64C, 105-123.

Weerkamp Bartholomeus, P. (2015). ReAttach a multimodal intervention for ASD? Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 12, 2, 18-22.

Weerkamp Bartholomeus, P. (2015). ReAttach a new schema therapy for adults and children? part I adults. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 12, 2 9-13.

Weerkamp Bartholomeus, P. (2018, May). Treatment of autism aspects and overlapping symptomatology from a network perspective of clinical neuropsychiatry. In P. Weerkamp Bartholomeus, Autism: is there a place for ReAttach Therapy? (pp. 63-122). Rome, Italy: Giovanni Fioriti Editore.

Wentz, E. (2005). Childhood onset neuropsychiatric disorders in adult eating disorder patients. A pilot study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 14,8, 431-437.

How to cite this article: Weerkamp – Bartholomeus, P. Autism: The Pre – Conceptual State of Mind. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities. 2018 Aug 15; 1(1):7-14.

Copyright ©2018 Weerkamp-Bartholomeus, P. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0)


Powered by WordPress and Bootstrap4