Engagement Across Generations: Navigating Employee Dynamics in Higher Education Post-COVID-19

Main Article Content

I Nyoman Sutapa
Magdalena Wullur
Isanti A. I.Edi
Soeharijadi

Abstract

Introduction: The study examines academic support staff engagement at a private university in Surabaya, Indonesia, from baby boomers to Gen Z. After COVID-19, managing multigenerational employees has been challenging. Older workers fear schedule and method changes. Online communication between academic support staff and lecturers is difficult. Different generations' ICT skills affect self-scheduling. The elderly have health and family responsibilities, while younger generations lack institutional commitment, causing exhaustion, monotony, and mental and physical health issues post-pandemic. We must address physical, social, and technological disparities and their effects on mental and physical health across generations.


Objectives: This study seeks to investigate the impact of generational disparities on employee engagement amidst considerable changes in work practices and increased health concerns.


Methods: An online survey of 375 employees yielded a 44.8% response. Based on Maslach and Leiter's Vigor, Dedication, and Absorption, the survey used a Likert scale. A structured methodology, consent, and Google Forms data collection ensured anonymity and confidentiality in the study. The study's goals and significance were also explained. One-way ANOVA was used to compare generational engagement and Cronbach's alpha for reliability.


Results: Gen Z engages least and Baby Boomers most. These differences show age cohorts' work motivations and expectations. Baby Boomers are more resilient and dedicated than Gen Z, requiring customized engagement. Low participation in Generation X and Millennials suggests different workplace preferences, job satisfaction, and work-life balance.


Conclusions: The findings show how life, technology, and workplace expectations affect generational work styles. Many boomers work hard and loyally. Resilience, role dedication, and institutional duty motivate them. Early workforce entry, inexperience, and hybrid work paradigm issues may explain Generation Z's low engagement. Lower Gen Z employee engagement suggests they need more inclusive and supportive engagement strategies like work flexibility, technological integration, and fast, professional advancement. For Generation X and Millennials, moderate engagement suggests work-life balance and meaning.

Article Details

How to Cite
I Nyoman Sutapa, Magdalena Wullur, Isanti A. I.Edi, & Soeharijadi. (2023). Engagement Across Generations: Navigating Employee Dynamics in Higher Education Post-COVID-19. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 6(9s), 1691–1700. https://doi.org/10.53555/jrtdd.v6i9s.2171
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

I Nyoman Sutapa

Industrial Engineering Department, Petra Christian University

Magdalena Wullur

Management Department, Sam Ratulangi University

Isanti A. I.Edi

Bureau of General & Personnel Administration, Petra Christian University

Soeharijadi

Bureau of General & Personnel Administration, Petra Christian University

References

Kumar, S. S., Subramanian, N. Generational diversity in the workplace: Challenges and opportunities in the aftermath of COVID-19. Global Business Review. 2021, 22(1), 214-231.

Murphy, M. P. Cross-generational conflict in the workplace: A review of the literature. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion. 2020, 17(4), 353-367.

Kalra, S., Sood, S. Impact of COVID-19 on the workplace: The way forward. Journal of Health Management, 2020, 22(2), 157–161.

Nausheen, S.; Shah, M. Understanding employee engagement during social distancing: A study of Indian service sector organizations. Journal of Human Resource Management. 2020, 8(4), 33-43.

Szabó, R. Z.; Almási, A. Leadership in the home office: A new challenge in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences. 2020, 15(6), 1179-1186.

Zhang, Y.; Ma, Z. Impact of COVID-19 on mental health and personal well-being among employees in the workplace. Journal of Psychosocial Research. 2020, 15(2), 295-302.

Chua, R. Y. J.; Roth, Y. Rethinking the boundaries of control and communication during COVID-19. Academy of Management Discoveries. 2021, 7(1), 89-93.

Farris, G. F.; Hutchison, E. L. Flexibility, work-life balance, and job satisfaction during COVID-19. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2021, 125, 103504.

Bhattacharjee, A.; Bhowal, S. Impact of COVID-19 on ICT-enabled teaching-learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies. 2021, 26(1), 1-24.

Kaliaraj, P.; Krishnaswamy, K. N. Role of ICT in higher education during COVID-19 pandemic: A study of Indian students' perception. Education and Information Technologies. 2020, 25(6), 5527-5545.

Basic, L. Examining Generational Differences in The Workplace: Employee Engagement Practices and their Impact on Retention of Different Generations of Human Resources Employees in Higher Education. Dissertations. 2018, 207. https://digitalcommons.brandman.edu/edd_dissertations/207.

Mishra, S.; Dwivedi, Y. K.; Rana, N. P. Digital transformation during a global pandemic: A review of the enabling role of ICT. Journal of Business Research. 2020, 118, 360–368.

Berman, M. G.; Nir, Y. Covid-19, fear, and the future: An essay by Michael G. Berman and Yair Nir. Social Science & Medicine. 2021, 278, 113965.

Chong, Y. Y.; Cheng, H. Y.; Chan, H. Y.; Chien, W. T. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among young adults with mental health disorders: A qualitative study. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 2021, 30(1), 111-120.

Ren, Y.; Qian, W.; Li, Z.; Li, J.; Chen, Z.; Guo, J. Public mental health under the long-term influence of COVID-19 in China: Geographical and temporal distribution. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2020, 277, 893–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.045.

Karayannis, G.; Awuah, A. The impact of COVID-19 on Generation X and baby boomers in the United States: A research agenda. Journal of Business Research. 2020, 117, 511-514.

Dutta, M. J.; Basu, R. COVID-19 pandemic and the emergence of the "digital generation". Journal of Creative Communications. 2021, 16(1), 1-5.

O'Neill, V.; Xiao, Q. Ensuring engagement during a crisis: How leaders can motivate and sustain employee engagement during COVID-19. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2020, 35(4), 409-415.

Bhatnagar, N.; George, B.; Pang, A. Examining remote work and work-life balance in the context of COVID-19. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2021, 33(1), 65-81.

Ferreira, P. Exploring employee engagement across generations in hospitality: A cross-sectional study of European countries. In 2nd International Conference on Tourism Research. 2019, p. 110.

Suomäki, A.; Kianto, A.; Vanhala, M. Work engagement across different generations in Finland: A Qualitative Study of Boomers, Yers and Xers. Knowledge and Process Management. 2019, 26(2), 140-151. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1604.

Brightenburg, M. E.; Whittington, J. L.; Meskelis, S.; Asare, E. Job engagement levels across the generations at work. In Global applications of multigenerational management and leadership in the transcultural era. 2020, pp. 108–137. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9906-7.ch004.

Atieq, M. Q. Comparative analysis of employee engagement in employees Generation X, Y, and Z. Al-Amwal: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syari'ah. 2019, 11(2), 285-299.

Lapoint, P. A.; Liprie-Spence, A. Employee Engagement: Generational Differences in the Workforce. Journal of Organizational Psychology. 2017, 17(5).

Pankowska, M.; Kalka, A. The influence of generational diversity on work engagement: The role of age, tenure, and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Research. 2018, 88, 372-379.

Gruman, J. A.; Saks, A. M.; Zweig, D. I. Organizational Behavior. Cengage Learning, 2021.

Kanfer, R.; Chen, G. Motivation in organizational behaviour: History, advances and prospects. Routledge, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.06.002.

Wang, X.; Yang, C.; Liu, Y. From work-family conflict to work-family enrichment: The role of employee engagement in the context of COVID-19. Journal of Business Research. 2021, 125, 142–151.

Alghamdi, M. G.; Alqarni, A. S.; Al-Rashdi, M. A.; Alharthi, M. S. The impact of COVID-19 on employee engagement: An empirical study from Saudi Arabia. Sustainability. 2021, 13(1), 88.

Adeyeye, O. A.; Adeyeye, B. O. Work from home: Implications for employee engagement and organizational performance. European Journal of Business and Management Research. 2020, 5(3), 16-27.

Den Hartog, D. N.; Boselie, P.; Paauwe, J. Employee well-being and the COVID-19 crisis: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2020, 41(4), 309-315.

Hidayati, N.; Ardiningsih, P. Employee engagement pada work from home di tengah pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan. 2021, 13(1), 15-24.

Nurlina, N.; Saputra, R. Pengaruh work from home dan kecemasan terhadap employee engagement pada masa pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Manajemen dan Pemasaran Jasa. 2020, 13(2), 178-191.

Arumsari, T.; Yudiarso, A. Dampak pandemi COVID-19 terhadap employee engagement di sektor bisnis. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen. 2020, 3(2), 198-210.

Larasati, D. P.; Hasanati, N. The effects of work-life balance towards employee engagement in the millennial generation. In 4th ASEAN Conference on Psychology, Counselling, and Humanities (ACPCH 2018) (2019, pp. 390-394). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/acpch-18.2019.93.

Frian, A.; Mulyani, F. Millenials employee turnover intention in Indonesia. Innovative Issues and Approaches in Social Sciences. 2018, 11(3), 90-111. https://doi.org/10.12959/issn.1855-0541.IIASS-2018-no3-art5.

Kahn, W. A. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal. 1990, 33(4), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287.

Maslach, C.; Leiter, M. P. Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2008, 93(3), 498-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.498.

Ryan, R. M.; Deci, E. L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist. 2000, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.

Shuck, B.; Reio, T. G. Employee engagement and well-being: A moderation model and implications for practice. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 2014, 21(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051813494240.

Saks, A. M. Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2006, 21(7), 600-619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169.

Sultana, N.; Hoque, K. E. 2021 Exploring employee engagement of academic staff in private universities of Bangladesh: An empirical investigation. Journal of Public Affairs. 2006, e2662.

Rahman, S. M.; Hossain, M. M. Employee engagement in the higher education sector of Bangladesh: an empirical study. International Journal of Higher Education. 2020, 9(3), 106-118.

Schaufeli, W. B.; Bakker, A. B.; Salanova, M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2006, 66(4), 701-716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471.

Schaufeli, W. B.; Salanova, M.; González-Romá, V.; Bakker, A. B. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2002, 3(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326.

Schaufeli, W. B.; Bakker, A. B. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2004, 25(3), 293-315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248.

Schaufeli, W. B.; Bakker, A. B. Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Preliminary manual. Occupational Health Psychology Unit. 2003, Utrecht University and Academic Medical Center. https://doi.org/10.1037/t07164-000.

Kupperschmidt, B. R. Multigenerational employees: Strategies for effective management. Health Care Management. 2000, 19(1), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1097/00126450-200019010-00011.

Basic, L. Examining Generational Differences in The Workplace: Employee Engagement Practices and their Impact on Retention of Different Generations of Human Resources Employees in Higher Education. Dissertations. 2018, 207. https://digitalcommons.brandman.edu/edd_dissertations/207.

Pew Research Center. Millennials overtake Baby Boomers as America's largest generation. 2016. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/04/25/millennials-overtake-baby-boomers/.

Tsai, M. Human resources management solutions for attracting and retaining millennial workers [e-book]. 2017. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2044-3.

Lancaster, L.C.; Stillman, D. When Generations Collide Who They Are. Why They Clash. How to Solve the Generational Puzzle at Work. 2002. New York: Harper Business.

Arsenault, P.; Patrick, M. Are the shoes appropriate to wear?: A study of cohort values. J Target Meas Anal Mark. 2008, 16, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2008.6.

Zemke, R.; Raines, C.; Filipczak, B. Generations at work: Managing the clash of veterans, boomers, Xers and nexters in your workplace. 1999, (2nd ed.). New York, NY: American Management Association.

Dogan, G.; Gen-Qing, C.; Ersem, K. Generational differences in work values and attitudes among frontline and service contract employees. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.04.002.

Jeongdoo, P.; Dogan, G. Generation Effect on Work Engagement among U.S Hotel Employees. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2012, 31, 1195 – 1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.02.007.

Pech, R. J.; Slade, B. Employee disengagement: Is there evidence of a growing problem? Handbook of Business Strategy. 2006, 7(1), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/10775730610618585.

Shuck, B. Four emerging perspectives of employee engagement: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review. 2011, 10, 304–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484311410840.

Murphy, M. M. Exploring generational differences among Millennials, Gen Xers, and Baby Boomers: Work values, manager behaviour expectations, and the impact of manager behaviours on work engagement. Doctoral dissertation, 2011. Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3487758).

Weingarten, R. M. Four generations, one workplace: A Gen X-Y staff nurse's view of team building in the emergency department. Journal of Emergency Nurse. 2009, 35, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2008.02.017.

White, M. Rethinking generational gaps in the workplace: Focus on shared values. 2011. Retrieved from https://www.kenan-flagler.unc.edu/executive-development/about/~/media/ C8FC09AEF03743BE91112418FEE286D0.ashx.

Akhavan Sarraf, A. R.; Abzari, M.; Nasr Isfahani, A.; Fathi, S. Generational differences in job engagement: a case study of an industrial organization in Iran. Industrial and Commercial Training. 2017, 49(3), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-10-2016-0068

Strauss, W.; Howe, N. Millennials rising: The next great generation. 2000. New York, NY: Random House.

Tulgan, B. Trends point to a dramatic generational shift in the future workforce. Employee Relations Today. 2004, 30, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/ert.10105.

Lyons, S. An exploration of generational values in life and at work. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. 2004, pp. 441–441. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.um.edu.my/docview/305203456?accountid=28930.

Tulgan, B.; Martin, C. A. Managing Generation Y, Global Citizens Born in the Late Seventies and Early Eighties. 2011. Massachusetts: HRD Press.

Cooper, D.R.; Schindler, P.S. Business Research Methods. 2014, 12th ed., New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.