Methods for Tapping the Competence of Hindi (L2) Learners

Main Article Content

Arun Kumar

Abstract

Adopting an appropriate methodology for eliciting data from students learning a foreign or second language (L2) has always been a tough task for tapping the competence of young learners’ before they lose interest in the data elicitation tasks requires researchers to be skillful and perceptive. This work stems from the research study conducted by Kumar (2017). It highlights the methodological procedure followed for collecting data from (L1) Korean students who were part of the Semester Aboard program at the Department of Linguistics, University of Delhi for learning Hindi (L2) as a foreign language from August to December 2016.

Article Details

How to Cite
Arun Kumar. (2023). Methods for Tapping the Competence of Hindi (L2) Learners. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 6(1), 836–848. https://doi.org/10.53555/jrtdd.v6i1.2222
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Arun Kumar

Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.

 

References

Agnihotri, R. K., & Sawhney, C. (1998). Acquisition of Hindi as a Second Language by Tamils in Delhi: A Social Psychological Perspective. In R. K. Agnihotri, A. Khanna, & I. Sachdev (Eds.), Social Psychological Perspectives on Second Language Learning (Vol. Research in Applied Linguistics). New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Cook, V. J. (2008). Second Language Learning and Language Teaching (4th ed.). London: Hodder Education.

Duffield, N., & White, L. (1999). Assessing L2 knowledge of Spanish clitic placement: converging methodologies. Second Language Research 15: 133–60. Second Language Research, 15, 133-160.

Freed, B. F. (Ed.). (1995). Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (Eds.). (2014). The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Great Britain: Routledge.

Ionin, T., & Wexler, K. (2002). Why is ‘is’ easier than ‘-s’?: acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research, 18, 95-136.

Joo, H.-R. (2003). Second language learnability and the acquisition of the argument structure of English locative verbs by Korean speakers. Second Language Research, 19, 305-328.

Kumar, A. (2017). Morpho-Syntactic Errors in Learning Hindi as a Foreign Language: A Study of Korean Students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Delhi, Delhi, India.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (Eds.). (2012). Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition: A Practical Guide (Ist ed.). UK: Wiley Blackwell.

Murphy, V. A. (1997). The effect of modality on a grammaticality judgment task. Second Language Research, 13(1), 34-65.

Ranjan, R. (2016). Acquisition of Ergative Case in L2 Hindi-Urdu. Iowa, USA: University of Iowa.

White, L. (2002). Morphological variability in endstate L2 grammars: the question of L1. In A. Do, S. Fish, & B. Skarabela (Ed.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Cascadilla Press, pp. 758-768. Somerville MA.

White, L. (2003). Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Yuan, B. (2001). The status of thematic verbs in the second language acquisition of Chinese. Second Language Research, 17, 248-272.

Zyzik, E. (2006). Transitivity alternations and sequence learning: insights from L2 Spanish production data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(3), 449-485.