The Other(ized) Side of Darkness: Locating the Nuances of Disability in Tagore’s “Drishtidaan”

Main Article Content

Dr. Dhriti Ray Dalai

Abstract

Tagore's early twentieth-century work, “Drishtidaan” (1898), from his short story collection Golpo Guchcha (1926) attempts to grapple with the issue of disability, as an interesting shift in focus, while recent postcolonial and postmodern discourses have emphasised marginalised aspects of existence such as the third world, queer communities, poverty, and tribal cultures. Tagore makes use of the narrative to locate "disability" in a manner similar to that of contemporary disability theorists, asserting that it exists at the point where individuals and socio-cultural surroundings interact. Irrespective of that radical reading, one might assess that by portraying Kumu, the blind protagonist, as an idealised representation of suffering femininity, Tagore, to some extent seems to be conforming to the historical tendency in literature to devalue individuals with "disabilities". Keeping that question in focus, this paper tries to look for the reason for this reductionist interpretation of the woman with "disability".

Article Details

How to Cite
Dr. Dhriti Ray Dalai. (2020). The Other(ized) Side of Darkness: Locating the Nuances of Disability in Tagore’s “Drishtidaan”. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 3(1), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.53555/jrtdd.v3i1.2235
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Dr. Dhriti Ray Dalai

Assistant Professor, Dept. of English, Faculty of Arts, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi- 221 005

References

R. N. Tagore. "Drishtidaan‟ in Golpo Guchcha. Kolkata: Visva Bharati Publication Cell.1926 (Bengali year 1333). Pp. 344-358. Print.

Sudhir Kakar. Intimate Relations: Exploring Indian Sexuality. Gurgaon: Penguin Books, 1990. P. 18. Print.

Richard Jenkins. “Disability and Social Stratification” in The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 42 . No. 4. P.562. Print.

R. N. Tagore. „Upagupta‟ in Current English for Language Skills, edited by M L Tickoo and A E Subramanian. Madras: Macmillan, 1989. Pp. 156-157. Print.

Sudhir Kakar. Intimate Relations: Exploring Indian Sexuality. Gurgaon: Penguin Books, 1990. P. 18. Print.

Susan Wendell. “Toward a Feminist Theory of Disability‟ in Hypatia. Vol. 4,. No. 2. Summer, 1989. P. 105. Print.

Howard Margolis and Arthur Shapiro. “Countering Negative Images of Disability in Classical Literature” in The English Journal. Vol. 76. No. 3. March, 1987. P. 21. Print.

Rita Banerjee. Sex and Power: Defining History, Shaping Societies. Gurgaon: Penguin Books, 2008. P. 305. Print.

Howard Margolis and Arthur Shapiro. “Countering Negative Images of Disability in Classical Literature” in The English Journal. Vol. 76. No. 3. March, 1987. P. 21. Print.

Sudhir Kakar. Intimate Relations: Exploring Indian Sexuality. Gurgaon: Penguin Books, 1990. P. 19. Print.

Ibid.

Ibid.

Rita Banerjee. Sex and Power: Defining History, Shaping Societies. Gurgaon: Penguin Books, 2008. P. 53. Print.

Bryan S Turner. “Disability and the Sociology of the Body” in Handbook of Disability Studies edited by Gary L Albrecht, Catherine D Seelman and Michael Bury. New Delhi: Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd, 2001. P. 259. Print.

Rita Banerjee. Sex and Power: Defining History, Shaping Societies. Gurgaon: Penguin Books, 2008. P. 304. Print.

Ibid. P. 53.

Howard Margolis and Arthur Shapiro. “Countering Negative Images of Disability in Classical Literature” in The English Journal. Vol. 76. No. 3 . March, 1987. P. 21. Print.

Ibid. p 20.

R N Tagore. The King of the Dark Chamber. New Delhi: Macmillan, 1983. P. 110. Print.