Transformation Of Hindu Marriage From Sacrament To Agreement
Main Article Content
Abstract
Marriage is considered as an indissoluble union between two souls to remain with each other forever under Hindu jurisprudence. It is also considered as a social institution as because it is a union of two families. As per Hindu law, marriage is a sacrament as well as it is a civil contract. Before Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 the nature of marriage was almost sacramental, however the codified Act and it’s time to time amendments has given a revolutionary perspective in the concept of marriage which was in vogue before the codification. The traditional Hindu marriage was a sea of diverse rituals. But after enactment of the Act some conditions are given more importance than religious rituals. Considerably during the few decades with the pronouncement of landmark judgments by the Supreme Court as well as various High Courts, and initiative taken by human rights organizations and women bodies has afforded to think marriage as an agreement more than sacrament. The acceptance of living relationship and growing instances of divorce cases by the members of the society also pushed to rethink over the nature of marriage before Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and aftermath of it in recent era of globalization.
The present paper will focus on marriage as a sacrament and marriage as a contract and the effect of rituals and registration of marriage among Hindu people.
Article Details
References
Manu is regarded as a Smritikar.
Manu IX, 3
Customary ritual.
Come into force in 18th May, 1955.
The words “or epilepsy” omitted by Act 39 of 1999, section 2.
As amended by the Child Marriage Restraint (Amendment) Act, 2 of 1978 substituting for the words ‘eighteen years’ and ‘fifteen years’, the words ‘twenty one years’ and, ‘eighteen years’ respectively.
Ibid
Is considered as a part of custom where the father of the bride make the gift of daughter to a bridegroom at the time of marriage.
Tulsa and others Vs. Durghatiya and others, 2008, 4 SCC,520
Badri Prasad VS. Dy. Director of Consolidation and others, AIR ,1978 SC 1557.
Section 20(1)(d) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.