Navigating Regulatory Landscapes: A Comprehensive Exploration of New Drug Approval Dossiers in the Complex Markets of the US, EU, and India

Main Article Content

P. V V Siva Krishna
P. Srinivasa Babu
Ch. V Prasad Rao
M. Keerthi
O. Kousalya
A. Maheswar Reddy
K. Chaitanya Kumari
T. V Sai Manikanta

Abstract

The Pharmaceutical Regulatory Affairs (PRA) division plays a crucial role within a pharmaceutical company by effectively steering the company's Research and Development (R&D) initiatives towards market success. In the current context, various countries possess distinct regulatory prerequisites for granting approval to a novel pharmaceutical product. Creating a cohesive regulatory plan for the submission of a new drug product's marketing authorization application (MAA), which could be applied across multiple countries through a single dossier, presents significant challenges.


Therefore, the knowledge of exact and detailed regulatory requirements for MAA of each country should be known to establish a suitable regulatory strategy. The creation of the Common Technical Document (CTD) was driven by the goal of establishing a uniform template for technical documentation, streamlining the process of compiling registration applications for human pharmaceuticals. This standardization also aimed to simplify the preparation of electronic submissions while reducing the associated time and resource requirements.


The development of a novel pharmaceutical necessitates extensive research across multiple domains, including chemistry, manufacturing practices, quality controls, preclinical sciences, and rigorous clinical trials. Regulatory agencies worldwide assign the task of assessing the research data to drug reviewers, who determine whether they substantiate the public health-serving attributes of safety, efficacy, and quality control for new pharmaceutical products. Each nation maintains an independent regulatory body tasked with enforcing rules and regulations, as well as issuing guidelines to oversee the marketing of pharmaceuticals. This work focuses on drug approval process and new drug applications in different countries like USA, Europe and India

Article Details

How to Cite
P. V V Siva Krishna, P. Srinivasa Babu, Ch. V Prasad Rao, M. Keerthi, O. Kousalya, A. Maheswar Reddy, K. Chaitanya Kumari, & T. V Sai Manikanta. (2023). Navigating Regulatory Landscapes: A Comprehensive Exploration of New Drug Approval Dossiers in the Complex Markets of the US, EU, and India. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 6(1), 834–941. https://doi.org/10.53555/jrtdd.v6i1.2384
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

P. V V Siva Krishna

Department of Pharmaceutics, Vignan Pharmacy College, Affiliated by JNTUK, Vadlamudi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India. Tel: +91 8328641564.

P. Srinivasa Babu

Department of Pharmaceutics, Vignan Pharmacy College, Affiliated by JNTUK, Vadlamudi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India - 522213.

Ch. V Prasad Rao

Department of Pharmaceutics, Vignan Pharmacy College, Affiliated by JNTUK, Vadlamudi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India - 522213.

M. Keerthi

Department of Pharmaceutics, Vignan Pharmacy College, Affiliated by JNTUK, Vadlamudi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India - 522213.

O. Kousalya

Department of Pharmaceutics, Vignan Pharmacy College, Affiliated by JNTUK, Vadlamudi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India - 522213.

A. Maheswar Reddy

Department of Pharmaceutics, Vignan Pharmacy College, Affiliated by JNTUK, Vadlamudi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India - 522213.

K. Chaitanya Kumari

Department of Pharmaceutics, Vignan Pharmacy College, Affiliated by JNTUK, Vadlamudi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India - 522213.

T. V Sai Manikanta

Department of Pharmaceutics, Vignan Pharmacy College, Affiliated by JNTUK, Vadlamudi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India - 522213.

References

Vishal P, Rahul Giri G, Pratik M, Kumar BJ. A review on drug approval process for US, Europe and India. Int J Drug Regul Aff. 2014 Mar 1; 2:1-1.

Kashyap UN, Gupta V, Raghunandan HV. Comparison of drug approval process in United States & Europe. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences and research. 2013 Jun 1;5(6):131.

Nitika Kaushal, Sachin Kumar Singh, Monica Gulati, Yogyata Vaidya et al, (2016). Study of regulatory requirements for the conduct of bioequivalence studies in US, Europe, Canada, India, ASEAN and SADC countries: Impact on generic drug substitution. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Sciences. 6(04):206-222.

Swapna G, Madhavi B, Ch AP, Rupa T. Comparative Study of Dossier Submission Process for Drug Product in USA, EU & Indian Regulatory. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2014;3(6):406-11.

Ramu B, Sathish Kumar M, Ramakrishna M. Current regulatory scenario for conducting clinical trials in India. Pharmaceut Reg Affairs. 2015;4(2):1-3.

Santra S, Saxena K, Anand G, Abdullah SM, Arora T. Comparison of Regulatory Aspects for the Conduct of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies. International Journal of Research in Pharmacy & Science. 2011 Jul 1;1(2).

Makvana P, Maheshwari D. Regulatory Requirements for Marketing Authorization of Generic Parentral Product in European Conutries by Decentralised Procedure'. EUROPE. 2014; 4:5

Sutar M, Gawhane D, Tenpe CR. Study of Drug Regulatory Approval Process a Comparative Requirement of Common Technical Documents (CTD) in Europe, USA and India in Coordination with Drug Developmental Process. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research. 2013;20(2):68-79.

Patel M, Patel K. An overview to CTD, ACTD and Indian requirements for dossier submission: Differences and similarities. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2015; 3: 2: 1746. 2013;51.

Lipsky MS, Sharp LK. From idea to market: the drug approval process. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice. 2001 Sep 1;14(5):362-7.

Jordan D. An overview of the Common Technical Document (CTD) regulatory dossier. Medical Writing. 2014 Jun 1;23(2):101-5.

Sahoo U, Kumar N. The Regulatory Affairs Profession in India. REGULATORY AFFAIRS JOURNAL PHARMA. 2007;18(1):25.

Aghade AB, Hatkar AD, Rawat SS, Vyas GV. REVIEW ON REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND DRUG APPROVAL PROCESS IN INDIA.

Mulaje SS. Procedure for drug approval in different countries: a review. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2013 Mar 17;3(2).

Bai JP, Abernethy DR. Systems pharmacology to predict drug toxicity: integration across levels of biological organization. Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology. 2013 Jan 6; 53:451-73.

Zhen LH. The drug registration application. J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci. 2003 May 1;6(2):211-4.

Deng R, Kaitin KI. The regulation and approval of new drugs in China. Drug information journal: DIJ/Drug Information Association. 2004 Jan; 38:29-39.

Gupta NV, ohan Reddy CM, Reddy KP, Kulkarni RA, Shivakumar HG. PROCESS OF APPROVAL OF NEW DRUG IN INDIA WITH EM PHASIS ON CLINICAL TRIALS. marketing. 2012 Mar; 6:8.

Jawahar N, Lakshmi VT. Regulatory requirements for the drug approval process in US, Europe and India. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2017 Oct 1;9(10):1943-52.

Baron JH. Modern improvements in medicine. BMJ. 2005 Jun 30;331(7507):22.

Ghalamkarpour A. Marketing authorization procedures in the European Union–making the right choice. Life science. 2009 Dec;33.

Lieberman HA, Lachman L, Joseph BS, Kanig JL. Preformulation. The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy; 3rd ed. Varghese Publishing House, Mumbai. 1987:183-4.

Chakraborty K, Yadav K. Drug approval process in US, Europe and India and its regulatory requirements: A Review. International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs (IJDRA). 2018;6(3):31-9.

K Mahapatra A, Sameeraja NH, Murthy PN. Drug approval process–in United States of America, European Union and India: a review. Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs. 2014 Apr 1;1(1):13-22.

Fimognari C, Barrajón-Catalán E, Luceri C, Turrini E, Raschi E, Bigagli E. New regulation on medical devices made of substances: Opportunities and challenges for pharmacological and toxicological research. Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation. 2022 Sep 16; 2:1001614.

Kuhlmann J, Wensing G. The applications of biomarkers in early clinical drug development to improve decision-making processes. Current Clinical Pharmacology. 2006 May 1;1(2):185-91.

Gupta NV, ohan Reddy CM, Reddy KP, Kulkarni RA, Shivakumar HG. PROCESS OF APPROVAL OF NEW DRUG IN INDIA WITH EM PHASIS ON CLINICAL TRIALS. marketing. 2012 Mar; 6:8.

Couzin J. Withdrawal of Vioxx casts a shadow over COX-2 inhibitors.

Wardell WM. Introduction of new therapeutic drugs in the United States and Great Britain: an international comparison. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 1973 Sep;14(5):773-90.

Chen F, Ye ZG, Liu L. An Introduction of the measures to ensure the Quality of Drug Evaluation in Some Developed Countries. Chin. Pharm. Affairs. 2004; 18:382-4.

Koberstein W. Fernand Sauer: Tending the Garden. Pharmaceutical Executive. 1996; 16:46-52.

Kingham RF, Bogaert PW, Eddy PS. The New European Medicines Agency. Food & Drug LJ. 1994; 49:301.

Bhatt A. Clinical trials in India: Pangs of globalization. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 2004 Jul 1;36(4):207.

Zhen LH. The drug registration application. J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci. 2003 May 1;6(2):211-4.

Cao WZ. Some thoughts on drug evaluation system reform in China. Chin. Pharm. J. (Chinese). 2004; 39:721-4.

Anusha A, Kumar R, Shaik R. Phytochemical Evaluation Curcuma Longa and Curcumin. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Chemical Sciences. 2016;5(4):5005-2277.

Krishna PV, Babu PS, Hemalatha P, Susmitha MJ, Pujitha T, Raju SL, Ravi K. In Vitro Bio-Equivalence Studies on Commercial Formulations Containing Paracetamol and Ibuprofen.