Habeas Corpus In Apex Courtan Alternative Path To Obtain Child Custody, Sidestepping The Traditional Custody Petition In District Court
Main Article Content
Abstract
It is historically presumed and also often found to be embedded in the legal principles of family laws of many modern-day countries that during a child's "tender" years (generally regarded as the age of four and under), the mother should have custody of the child. The family laws prevalent in India upholds the doctrine no differently and, generally, in any custodial dispute between sparring couples having “tender aged” children, usually the custodianship is awarded to the mother.
However, in recent times, the ‘tender-years’ doctrine has been replaced by ‘best interests of the child’ doctrine in advanced economies such as the USA and European Union as the tender-years doctrine was often not doing the justice in terms of child welfare needs and in USA the tender-years doctrine was found to be violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Article Details
References
Vivek Singh Vs. Romani Singh 2017(3) SCC 231
McGrath (Infants), [1893] 1 Ch. 143 C.A
Elizabeth Dinshaw Vs. Arvand M. Dinshaw, 1987(1) SCC 42
Rajeswarin Chandrasekhar Ganesh Vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors
“O” (An Infant), [1965] 1 Ch. 23 C.A.
Walker v. Walker & Harrison, 1981 New Ze Recent Law 257
American Jurisprudence, (2nd Edn. Vol. 39)
Kanu Sanyal Vs. District Magistrate, Darjeeling & Ors. (1973) 2 SCC 674
Surya Vadanan v. State of Tamil Nadu), (2015) 5 SCC 450
Halsbury's Laws of England, Fourth Edition, Vol. 24, Article 511 at page 217
The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956
Guardians and Wards Act, 1890
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955