The Impact of Son Preference on Fertility Dynamics and Gender Imbalance: A Focus on India

Main Article Content

Ningombam Santamala Chanu
Oinam Tomba Singh

Abstract

Son preference significantly impacts fertility dynamics in many developing countries, notably in India, where it profoundly influences demographic trends, gender ratios, and socio-economic structures. Cultural norms and socio-economic factors drive this preference, with sons valued as carriers of family lineage and economic providers, while daughters are often perceived as financial burdens due to dowry practices. Consequently, families exhibit differential treatment of children, resort to selective abortion, and maintain higher fertility rates to ensure the birth of a male child. These practices lead to skewed sex ratios and contribute to socio-economic issues such as increased violence and trafficking of women. Despite government efforts like the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act and the Beti Bachao Beti Padhao campaign, the persistence of son preference poses a formidable challenge to demographic equilibrium and gender equality. This review examines the cultural and socio-economic drivers of son preference, its impact on fertility rates and gender ratios, policy interventions, and strategies to promote gender equality and mitigate its adverse effects, particularly in India.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ningombam Santamala Chanu, & Oinam Tomba Singh. (2021). The Impact of Son Preference on Fertility Dynamics and Gender Imbalance: A Focus on India. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 4(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.53555/jrtdd.v4i1.2873
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Ningombam Santamala Chanu

Assistant Professor, Department of Statistics, Standard College, Kongba (Imphal East - India)

Oinam Tomba Singh

Associate Professor, Department of Statistics, Dhanamanjuri University, Manipur (India)

References

Arnold, F. (1997). Gender preferences for children. Demographic and Health Surveys Comparative Studies No. 23. Calverton, MD: Macro International Inc.

Arnold, F., Kishor, S., and Roy, T. K. (1998). Sex-selective abortions in India. Population and Development Review, 24(4), 759-785.

Bhat, P. N. M., and Zavier, A. J. F. (2003). Fertility decline and gender bias in northern India. Demography, 40(4), 637-657.

Bongaarts, J. (2013). The implementation of preferences for male offspring. Population and Development Review, 39(2), 185-208.

Bongaarts, J., and Guilmoto, C. Z. (2015). How many more missing women? Excess female mortality and prenatal sex selection, 1970–2050. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 241-269.

Clark, S. (2000). Son preference and sex composition of children: Evidence from India. Demography, 37(1), 95-108.

Das Gupta, M. (1987). Selective discrimination against female children in rural Punjab, India. Population and Development Review, 13(1), 77-100.

Das Gupta, M. (2014). Population, poverty, and climate change. The World Bank.

Das Gupta, M., Zhenghua, J., Bohua, L., Zhenming, X., Chung, W., and Hwa-Ok, B. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India, and the Republic of Korea. Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 153-187.

Guilmoto, C. Z. (2009). The sex ratio transition in Asia. Population and Development Review, 35(3), 519-549.

Hesketh, T., and Xing, Z. W. (2006). Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: Causes and consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(36), 13271-13275.

Jha, P., Kesler, M. A., Kumar, R., Ram, F., Ram, U., Aleksandrowicz, L., and Bassani, D. G. (2011). Trends in selective abortions of girls in India: Analysis of nationally representative birth histories from 1990 to 2005 and census data from 1991 to 2011. The Lancet, 377(9781), 1921-1928.

Kaur, R. (2013). Mapping the adverse consequences of sex selection and gender imbalance in India and China. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(35), 37-44.

Patel, T. (2016). Cultural politics of gender equity: An analysis of the Beti Bachao Beti Padhao campaign. Journal of Gender Studies, 25(4), 488-504.

Patel, V. (2007). The political economy of missing girls in India. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 9(1), 1-28.

Sekher, T. V. (2012). Ladlis and Lakshmis: Financial incentive schemes for the girl child. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(22), 49-56.

Sekher, T. V., and Hatti, N. (2010). Disappearing daughters and intensification of gender bias: Evidence from two village studies in South India. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(48), 65-72.

UNFPA. (2020). Gender-biased sex selection in India. United Nations Population Fund.

United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). (2020). State of World Population 2020: Against my will. Defying the practices that harm women and girls and undermine equality. UNFPA.