Direct Taxation in a Liberalized Economy: Challenges and Implications for Corporate Strategy

Main Article Content

Shalini Aggarwal

Abstract

This paper aims at understanding the effects of direct tax reforms on corporate planning in a liberalised economy with specific reference to India. The study looks at the impact of dynamic tax policies including the use of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Minimum Alternative Tax (MAT) on the planning and management. Some of the areas covered are managing change such as adapting to policy change, investment and growth decision making, managing risks and broadening corporate tax base. It is found that taxes play a key role in strategic decision-making by changing the level of compliance costs, investment profiles, and profitability. Empirical findings indicate that high corporate tax rates and increased cost of compliance with tax laws reduce profitability but strategic management of taxes can reduce these effects. The two examples of Tata Consultancy Services and Reliance Industries explain how firms respond to tax changes by deploying technology and organizational changes. The results of the study imply that despite the fact that direct tax reforms may raise short-term compliance costs and tax liabilities, they also stimulate corporations to enhance their efficient tax management. The study therefore concludes that there is need for proper tax reforms that will help generate revenues while at the same time not overburdening business with taxes that will affect their profitability; the study also pointed out the need for proper management of taxes as well as anticipation of taxes that are likely to be implemented by the government in future.

Article Details

How to Cite
Shalini Aggarwal. (2022). Direct Taxation in a Liberalized Economy: Challenges and Implications for Corporate Strategy. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 5(2), 480–490. https://doi.org/10.53555/jrtdd.v5i2.3175
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Shalini Aggarwal

Associate professor, Dyal singh College, University of Delhi,

References

Bernardi, L., & Fraschini, A. (2005). Tax System and Tax Reforms in India. Department of Public Policy and Public Choice, University of Pavia.

Gupta, A., & Gang, I. N. (2000). Decomposing Revenue Effects of Tax Evasion and Tax Structure Changes. International Tax and Public Finance, 7(2), 177-194.

Gupta, A., Lahiri, R., & Mookherjee, D. (1995). Income Tax Compliance in India: An Empirical Analysis. World Development, 23(12), 2051-2064.

Nidheesh, K. B. (2010). Direct tax reforms and various schemes of income tax in india. Asia Pacific Journal of Research in Business Management, 1(3), 131-140.

Panda, P., Das, K., & Mohanty, M. K. (2020). Direct Tax Reform in India: An Impact Analysis with Special Reference to Government Revenue. Orissa Journal of Commerce, XXXXI, 1, 66-85.

Prakash, O., & Sindhu, A. S. (2011). Direct Tax Reforms in India: A Comparative Study of Pre- and Post-liberalization Periods. The IUP Journal of Public Finance, 9(1), 1-13.

Rao, M. G. (2005). Tax System Reform in India: Achievements and Challenges Ahead. Journal of Asian Economics, 16(6), 993-1011.

Sharma, A., & Singh, J. (2017). Estimating the Income Tax Responsiveness in India: A Post Liberalization Era Analysis. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(9), 315-323.

Singh, K. J. (2008). On Tax Evaders and Corrupt Auditors. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 17(1), 37-67.

Pillarisetti, J. R. (1995). Direct Tax Reform in Privatized Economies: A Comparative Study of India and Latin American Countries. International Journal of Social Economics, 22(8), 22-33.

Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4), 323-338.

Tsakumis, G. T., Curatola, A. P., & Porcano, T. M. (2007). The Relation between National Cultural Dimensions and Tax Evasion. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 16(2), 131-147.

Bagchi, A. (2013). Priorities for a Tax Programme. Economic & Political Weekly, 8(8), 435-443.

Engin, O. N. E. R. (2015). Problems and Recommendations over Tax Policies. Expert Journal of Finance, 3(1).

Diamond, P., & Saez, E. (2011). The case for a progressive tax: From basic research to policy recommendation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4), 165-190.

Woodbury, C. (1969, January). National Commission on Urban Problems: Property Tax Recommendations. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Taxation under the Auspices of the National Tax Association (Vol. 62, pp. 89-97). National Tax Association.

Miller, R. N. (1951). The Law Institute's Income Tax Project: An Answer to a Challenge. American Bar Association Journal, 191-194.

Plumb, W. T. (1974). The Tax Recommendations of the Commission on the Bankruptcy Laws: Income Tax Liabilities of the Estate and the Debtor. Michigan Law Review, 72(5), 935-1028.

Kornhauser, M. E. (2006). A tax morale approach to compliance: Recommendations for the IRS. Fla. Tax Rev., 8, 599.

Olivera, H. E. (1975). A CRITICAL ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF SOME OF THE INEQUITIES OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX SYSTEM WITH SOME RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REFORM. The University of Arizona.