“From Cities to Hometowns: The Socioeconomic Realities of Return Migration in Karnataka"
Main Article Content
Abstract
Migration patterns are often influenced by economic, social and cultural factors, shaping the choices of both migrants and their families. This research is conducted in the 2 Class-IV towns of Dharwad district namely Alnawar and Kundgol and the data is collected through structured interview schedule. Based on Multi-stage random sampling method the sample size is limited to 158. This study examines the perspectives of both migrants and household heads regarding return migration in Karnataka. Findings indicate that 59.41% of household heads preferred male migrants to return hometo manage ancestral property, while 30.69% opposed their return due to limited economic opportunities. In contrast, 75.44% were unwilling for female migrants to return, reinforcing traditional beliefs that married women belong to their husband’s household. In total, 75.95% of migrants were unwilling to return, citing economic limitations, career aspirations, and social commitments. Meanwhile, 12.03% expressed a desire to return, primarily for emotional or property-related reasons, while 8.86% remained undecided, consisting mostly of students or recent migrants. These findings highlight the complex interplay of tradition, economic security and personal aspirations in shaping return migration trends.
Article Details
References
Cassarino, J. P. (2004). Theorizing Return Migration: The Conceptual Approach to Return Migrants Revisited. International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 6(2), 253–279.
Chand, R., & Srivastava, S. K. (2014). Changes in the Rural Labour Market and Their Implications for Agriculture. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(10), 47-54.
Deshingkar, P., & Akter, S. (2009). Migration and Human Development in India. UNDP Human Development Research Paper, 2009/13.
Dutta, P., et al. (2012). Does India’s Employment Guarantee Scheme Guarantee Employment? The World Bank Economic Review, 26(3), 294-318.
Ellis, F. (2003). A Livelihoods Approach to Migration and Poverty Reduction. Overseas Development Group, University of East Anglia.
Gupta, A., & Pal, S. (2021). Reverse Migration in India Post COVID-19: Impact and Challenges. Journal of Migration Studies, 5(1), 45-62.
King, R. (2000). Generalizations from the History of Return Migration. Return Migration: Journey of Hope or Despair?, 7–55.
Kundu, A. (2009). Exclusionary Urbanisation in India: Causes, Consequences and Policy Prescriptions. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(48), 48-59.
McCormick, B., & Wahba, J. (2001). Overseas Work Experience, Savings, and Entrepreneurship Amongst Return Migrants to LDCs. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48(2), 164–178.
Rajan, S. I., & Bhagat, R. B. (2021). Pandemic and Migrant Workers: Policy Imperatives and Challenges for India. Springer.
T V Shekar (1996) Male migrants and changes in the family impact on female sense roles”. Indian Journal Of Social Work. Vol. 57, Issue 2, 1996.