Comparative Study On The Efficacy Of Different Crystalloid Solutions In The Management Of Diabetic Ketoacidosis

Main Article Content

Dr.Thota Sreekanth
Dr.Sreechandan Reddy

Abstract

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a very serious complication of diabetes and is elaborated as hyperglycemia, ketosis and acidosis. It has been linked with big morbidity and mortality rates making its treatment very quick and efficient. The main intervention that is applied when managing DKA is the restoration of the acidotic state by intravenous (i.v.) fluid resuscitation. Normal Saline (NS), Ringer Lactate (RL) and Plasmalyte (PL) are popular examples of crystalloids because of their low costs. This research sought to appraise how these three fluids affect levels of serum electrolytes, anion gap, blood pH, and resolution of DKA in the patients. One hundred and fifty patients with the diagnosis DKA were randomly spaced into three groups (50 patients in each arm). Normal saline was administered to the patients in Group A (NS), Ringer lactate to the patients in Group B (RL), whereas plasmalyte was administered to the patients in Group C (PL). Serum electrolytes and blood pH level examination were done on a baseline and every hour, 8 hours. The findings showed that Plasmalyte (PL) was associated with the greatest improvement in metabolic acidosis, it had an increased decrease in serum chloride with a faster rate of recovery as compared to normal saline and Ringer lactate. Although both normal saline and Ringer lactate were regarded as significant in changing serum bicarbonate levels, Plasmalyte had a better rate in acidosis correction as well as electrolyte metion misbalance. It is believed that the best fluid to use to treat DKA is Plasmalyte since it proves significantly faster to recover and exhibit fewer electrolyte imbalances than normal saline and Ringer lactate. In this study, the possible benefits of using Plasmalyte in the resuscitation of fluids in patients with DKA are indicated.


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Dr.Thota Sreekanth, & Dr.Sreechandan Reddy. (2022). Comparative Study On The Efficacy Of Different Crystalloid Solutions In The Management Of Diabetic Ketoacidosis. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 5(2), 680–685. https://doi.org/10.53555/jrtdd.v5i2.3672
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Dr.Thota Sreekanth

Assistant Professor, Bharath Medical College and Hospital, Selaiyur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600073, India.

Dr.Sreechandan Reddy

Assistant Professor, Bharath Medical College and Hospital, Selaiyur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600073, India.

References

AE Kitabchi, G.E Umpierrez. Thirty years of personal experience in hyperglycaemic crises: Diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar state. ClinEndocrinolMetab. 2008; 93(5):1541–52.

National Center for Health Statistics. National hospital discharge and ambulatory surgery data. [article online]. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/hdasd/nhds.htm Accessed 24 January 2016.

S Kim. Burden of hospitalizations primarily due to uncontrolled diabetes: implications of inadequate primary health care in the United States. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30:1281–82.

BJ Welch, I Zib. Case Study: Diabetes Ketoacidosis in Type 2 Diabetes: “Look Under the Sheets” Clinical Diabetes. 2004; 22(4):198–200

S Misra, N Oliver, ADornhorst. Diabetic ketoacidosis: not always due to type 1 diabetes. BMJ. 2013; 346:f3501.

A Balasubramanyam, JW Zern, DJ Hyman, V Pavlik. New profiles of diabetic ketoacidosis: type 1 and type 2 diabetes and the effect of ethnicity. Arch Intern Med. 1999; 159:2317–22.

PM Adhikari, N Mohammed, P Pereira. Changing profile of diabetic ketosis. J Indian Med Assoc. 1997; 95(10):540–42.

CR Kahn, GC Weir. 13th Edition. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; In: Joslin’s Diabetes Mellitus; 1996.p. 489–507.

JF Munro, IW Campbell, AC McCuish, LJ Duncan. Euglycaemic diabetic ketoacidosis. Br Med J. 1973; 2:578–80.

OA Fasanmade, IA Odeniyi, AO Ogbera. Diabetes ketoacidosis: diagnosis and management: Afr. J Med Med Sci. 2008; 37(2):99–105.

Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients [Cochrane review]. In: The Cochrane Library. 2009.

O’ Malley CMN, Frumento RJ. A randomised, double-blind comparison of lactated Ringer’s solution and 0.9% NaCl during renal transplantation. AnaesthAnalg. 2005; 100:1518-1524.

Dhatariya KK. Diabetic ketoacidosis. Saline should be used for fluid replacement rather than Hartmann’s solution. BMJ. 2007; 334:1284-1285.

Stoneham MD, Hill EL. Variability in post-operative fluid and electrolyte prescription. Br J ClinPract 1997; 51:82–84.

Greenfield RH, Bessen HA, Henneman PL. Effect of crystalloid infusion on hematocrit and intravascular volume in healthy, nonbleeding subjects. Ann Emerg Med 1989; 18:51–55.

Scheingraber S, Rehm M, Sehmisch C. Rapid saline infusion produces hyperchloremic acidosis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:1265–1270.

Reid F, Lobo DN, Williams RN . (Ab)normal saline and physiological Hartmann’s solution: a randomized double-blind crossover study. ClinSci(Lond) 2003; 104:17–24.

Williams EL, Hildebrand KL, McCormick SA. The effect of intravenous lactated Ringer’s solution versus 0.9% sodium chloride solution on serum osmolality in human volunteers. AnesthAnalg 1999; 88:

999–1003.

Protheroe, R., & Nolan, J. Which fluid to give?. Trauma, 2001. edn:3. 151-160.

McFarlane C, Lee A. A comparison of Plasmalyte 148 and 0.9% saline for intra-operative fluid replacement. Anaesthesia. 1994 Sep; 49(9):779-81.

Shaw AD, Bagshaw SM, Goldstein SL, Scherer LA, Duan M, Schermer CR, etal. Major complications, mortality, and resource utilization after open abdominal surgery: 0.9% saline compared to Plasma- Lyte. Ann Surg. 2012 May; 255(5):821-9.

Van Zyl DG, Rheeder P, Delport E. Fluid management in diabetic-acidosis—Ringer’s lactate versus normal saline: a randomized controlled trial.

Chua HR, Venkatesh B, Stachowski E, Schneider AG, Perkins K, LIDFnyi Setal. Plasma-Lyte 148 vs 0.9% saline for fluid resuscitation in diabetic ketoacidosis. J Crit Care. 2012 Apr; 27(2):138-45.