Comparison of viscosity of different orthodontic bonding agent -invitro study
Main Article Content
Abstract
To compare the 3M Unitek Transbond XT and Ormco Enlight Light Cure Adhesive's bonding agents' viscosities.
Materials and method: contact angle of the bonding agent of 3M Unitek Transbond XT and Ormco Enlight Light Cure Adhesive's bonding agents' was found using contact angle goniometer.
Results: The average contact angle for Ormco Enlight Light Cure Adhesive was 25.74 degrees and the average contact angle of 3M Unitek Transbond XT was 43.27 degrees
Conclusion: The low viscosity bonding agent Ormco Enlight Light Cure Adhesive can be conveniently applied for bonding orthodontic brackets.
Article Details
References
Buonocore MG. Principles of adhesive retention and adhesive restorative materials [Internet]. Vol. 67, The Journal of the American Dental Association. 1963. p. 382–91. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1963.0301
Kubo S, Finger WJ, Müller M, Podszun W. Principles and Mechanisms of Bonding with Dentin Adhesive Materials [Internet]. Vol. 3, Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 1991. p. 62–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00812.x
Arhun N, Cehreli SB. Do Adhesive Systems Leave Resin Coats on the Surfaces of the Metal Matrix Bands? An Adhesive Remnant Characterization [Internet]. Vol. 33, The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2013. p. e43–50. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.1129
Tavas MA, Watts DC. The use of a cone and plate viscometer for determination of flow properties of unfilled resins and etching gels. J Oral Rehabil. 1989 Mar;16(2):185–92.
Cook PA, Luther F, Youngson CC. An in vitro study of the bond strength of light-cured glass ionomer cement in the bonding of orthodontic brackets [Internet]. Vol. 18, The European Journal of Orthodontics. 1996. p. 199–204. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/18.2.199
Barik AK, Duggal R. Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Chemically Cured and Light-Cured Orthodontic Bonding Agents and Surface Alteration of Enamel: An in vitro Study [Internet]. Vol. 54, Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society. 2020. p. 233–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0301574220937525
Bridi EC, Leme-Kraus AA, Basting RT, Bedran-Russo AK. TiF 4 pretreatment followed by self-etching adhesive system: Nanomechanical properties [Internet]. Vol. 33, Dental Materials. 2017. p. e15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.08.026
Dursun E, Attal JP. Self-etching adhesive glass ionomer: Saliva effects on dentin bond strength [Internet]. Vol. 26, Dental Materials. 2010. p. e140. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.110
Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: A comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems [Internet]. Vol. 25, Dental Materials. 2009. p. 1459–67. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.07.002
Oliveira AS, Barwaldt CK, Bublitz LS, Moraes RR. Impact of bracket displacement or rotation during bonding and time of removal of excess adhesive on the bracket–enamel bond strength [Internet]. Vol. 41, Journal of Orthodontics. 2014. p. 124–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1465313313y.0000000087
Shear Bond Strength of Adhesive Precoated (APC II) Bracket Bonded with Self - etching Primer [Internet]. Korean Journal of Dental Materials. 2011. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14815/kjdm.2011.03.38.1.9
Malik SA, Laxmikanth SM. Comparative Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength and Debonding Properties of a New Self Etch Adhesive Composite Cement and Self Etching Primer Composite System Used for Orthodontic Bracket bonding - An In Vitro Study [Internet]. Vol. 5, Acta Scientific Dental Scienecs. 2021. p. 112–24. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.31080/asds.2021.05.1130
A study of the wettability of tooth surfaces for bonding orthodontic attachments [Internet]. Vol. 53, American Journal of Orthodontics. 1967. p. 139. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(67)90232-1
Justus R. Deproteinization of tooth enamel surfaces to prevent white spot lesions and bracket bond failure: A revolution in orthodontic bonding [Internet]. Vol. 6, APOS Trends in Orthodontics. 2016. p. 179–84. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2321-1407.186431
Akerboom HBM, Kreulen CM, van Amerongen WE, Mol A. Radiopacity of posterior composite resins, composite resin luting cements, and glass ionomer lining cements [Internet]. Vol. 70, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1993. p. 351–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90221-9
Lee Y, Park JW. Effect of moisture and drying time on the bond strength of the one-step self-etching adhesive system [Internet]. Vol. 37, Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2012. p. 155. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.3.155
Nunes TG, Erhardt MCG, Toledano M, Osorio R. One-step self-etching adhesive polymerization: Influence of a self-curing activator [Internet]. Vol. 37, Journal of Dentistry. 2009. p. 616–21. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.003
Wright WL. Tensile Bond and Rebond Strength of Four Orthodontic Adhesives: A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment ... Orthodontics .. 1984. 94 p.