Psychological Impact of Globalization on Human Civilization in Sense of Social, Psychology, Economy, Law, Politics and the Contemporary Economy
Main Article Content
Abstract
However, it cannot be said that democracy including its conduct has always been carefully deployed for the attention and balance of human civilization, nor have they solved this problem fairly. Now is the time for mankind to treat democratic culture with caution, improve its theoretical foundations corresponding to the needs of the times, and solve world complications. It is therefore critical to establish the most common correlation between globalization along with “democracy moreover ensure an active balance”. In this article, the authors define the complex action of globalization along with its impact on national sovereignty. In particular, it was cornered out a ‘certain globalization accept both positive and adverse sides’. However, globalization primarily brings about great political and social changes at the global level. Therefore, this study points out that globalization is a very complex process and cannot be challenged in a particular dimension. Therefore, the authors specifically postulate globalization and coordination between “globalism and national sovereignty”. The significance of this paper, therefore, presents a wide range of global considerations by today's leading theorists about the aspects and effects of globalization, with arguably positive assessments and explanations, as well as categorizing the action of globalization as highly questionable. It mentions both in the explanation it explains. process. The authors conclude that the “process of globalization has brought about changes in classic ideology” in many areas and, in a closely social sense, fundamental changes in our perceptions of ‘economics, law, politics and the contemporary economy’ has clearly reached. The overall research method is considered the appropriate democratic capacity for globalization.
Article Details
References
Amjad, R.M., Rafay, A., Arshed, N., Munir, M. and Amjad, M.M., 2022. Non-linear impact of
globalization on financial crimes: a case of developing economies. Journal of Money Laundering
Control, 25(2), pp.358-375.
Chryssogelos, A., 2020. State transformation and populism: From the internationalized to the neosovereign state?. Politics, 40(1), pp.22-37.
Ergashev, I. and Farxodjonova, N., 2020. Integration of national culture in the process of globalization.
Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(2), p.477.
Flew, T., 2020. Globalization, neo-globalization and post-globalization: The challenge ofpopulism
and the return of the national. Global Media and Communication, 16(1), pp.19-39. GumbrellMcCormick, R. and Hyman, R., 2019. Democracy in trade unions, democracythrough trade
unions?. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 40(1), pp.91-110.
Isroilovich, I.M., 2020. Philosophical ideas and views of national culture in the condition of
globalization. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(7), pp.14289-14295.Kellner, D.
and Kellner, D., 2021. Globalization, technopolitics and revolution. Technology and Democracy: Toward
A Critical Theory of Digital Technologies, Technopolitics, and Technocapitalism, pp.153-177.
Kistaubayev, S., 2021. THE HUMAN FACTOR IN THE GLOBALIZATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 9(12), pp.1062-
Kodirov, N., 2020. Problems of the globalization of information culture in the current time. In Ştiinţă,
educaţie, cultură (Vol. 4, pp. 272-274).
Landman, T. and Silverman, B.W., 2019. Globalization and modern slavery. Politics and Governance,
(4).
Rogers, M., Siregar, G. and Siregar, S.A., 2020. Existence Of Pancasila As A Stats fundamental NormOf
The Nation And State Of Indonesia In Facing Economic Globalization Challenges. Journal of
Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(6), pp.589-595.
Torp, S. and Reiersen, J., 2020. Globalization, work, and health: a nordic perspective.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), p.7661.