Psychological Impact of Globalization on Human Civilization in Sense of Social, Psychology, Economy, Law, Politics and the Contemporary Economy

Main Article Content

Dharmendra Kumar Kumawat
Leopoldo Choque-Flores
Adarsh Kumar
Vandana Yadav
Renzon Daniel Cosme Pecho
Agustinus Supriyanto

Abstract

However, it cannot be said that democracy including its conduct has always been carefully deployed for the attention and balance of human civilization, nor have they solved this problem fairly. Now is the time for mankind to treat democratic culture with caution, improve its theoretical foundations corresponding to the needs of the times, and solve world complications. It is therefore critical to establish the most common correlation between globalization along with “democracy moreover ensure an active balance”. In this article, the authors define the complex action of globalization along with its impact on national sovereignty. In particular, it was cornered out a ‘certain globalization accept both positive and adverse sides’. However, globalization primarily brings about great political and social changes at the global level. Therefore, this study points out that globalization is a very complex process and cannot be challenged in a particular dimension. Therefore, the authors specifically postulate globalization and coordination between “globalism and national sovereignty”. The significance of this paper, therefore, presents a wide range of global considerations by today's leading theorists about the aspects and effects of globalization, with arguably positive assessments and explanations, as well as categorizing the action of globalization as highly questionable. It mentions both in the explanation it explains. process. The authors conclude that the “process of globalization has brought about changes in classic ideology” in many areas and, in a closely social sense, fundamental changes in our perceptions of ‘economics, law, politics and the contemporary economy’ has clearly reached. The overall research method is considered the appropriate democratic capacity for globalization.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dharmendra Kumar Kumawat, Leopoldo Choque-Flores, Adarsh Kumar, Vandana Yadav, Renzon Daniel Cosme Pecho, & Agustinus Supriyanto. (2023). Psychological Impact of Globalization on Human Civilization in Sense of Social, Psychology, Economy, Law, Politics and the Contemporary Economy. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 6(6s), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.53555/jrtdd.v6i6s.721
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Dharmendra Kumar Kumawat

Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Law, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, Punjab151401, India

Leopoldo Choque-Flores

Doctor, Department of Engineering, Universidad Cesar Vallejo, Lima, Peru, ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0914-7159

Adarsh Kumar

Assistant Professor, School of Journalism & Mass Communication, Noida International University, Uttar Pradesh, India

Vandana Yadav

Research Scholar, Department of Journalism & Mass Communication, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, India, 

Renzon Daniel Cosme Pecho

Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru

Agustinus Supriyanto

Head of Department, Department of International Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

References

Amjad, R.M., Rafay, A., Arshed, N., Munir, M. and Amjad, M.M., 2022. Non-linear impact of

globalization on financial crimes: a case of developing economies. Journal of Money Laundering

Control, 25(2), pp.358-375.

Chryssogelos, A., 2020. State transformation and populism: From the internationalized to the neosovereign state?. Politics, 40(1), pp.22-37.

Ergashev, I. and Farxodjonova, N., 2020. Integration of national culture in the process of globalization.

Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(2), p.477.

Flew, T., 2020. Globalization, neo-globalization and post-globalization: The challenge ofpopulism

and the return of the national. Global Media and Communication, 16(1), pp.19-39. GumbrellMcCormick, R. and Hyman, R., 2019. Democracy in trade unions, democracythrough trade

unions?. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 40(1), pp.91-110.

Isroilovich, I.M., 2020. Philosophical ideas and views of national culture in the condition of

globalization. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(7), pp.14289-14295.Kellner, D.

and Kellner, D., 2021. Globalization, technopolitics and revolution. Technology and Democracy: Toward

A Critical Theory of Digital Technologies, Technopolitics, and Technocapitalism, pp.153-177.

Kistaubayev, S., 2021. THE HUMAN FACTOR IN THE GLOBALIZATION OF

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 9(12), pp.1062-

Kodirov, N., 2020. Problems of the globalization of information culture in the current time. In Ştiinţă,

educaţie, cultură (Vol. 4, pp. 272-274).

Landman, T. and Silverman, B.W., 2019. Globalization and modern slavery. Politics and Governance,

(4).

Rogers, M., Siregar, G. and Siregar, S.A., 2020. Existence Of Pancasila As A Stats fundamental NormOf

The Nation And State Of Indonesia In Facing Economic Globalization Challenges. Journal of

Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(6), pp.589-595.

Torp, S. and Reiersen, J., 2020. Globalization, work, and health: a nordic perspective.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), p.7661.