Balancing Justice and Rehabilitation: An Examination of India's Minimum Age from Psychological Viewpoint for Determining Criminal Liability

Abstract

The complex balancing act between rehabilitation and justice is explored in this study paper in relation to India's minimum age for criminal culpability in situations of sexual offenses. To shed light on the efficacy of the existing strategy and possible directions for development, it examines the legal, social, and psychological aspects of this issue.

The study begins by examining the historical progression and evolution of India’s legal minimum age of criminal responsibility, taking into accounts the circumstances and concerns that have influenced its establishment. It explores the current legal system, looking at pertinent statutes, clauses, and how they are put into practice with a focus on sexual offenses.

The study assesses whether India's legal minimum age for criminal responsibility helps victims of sexual offenses receive justice. In order to determine how well the current strategy meets the interests and rights of victims, it evaluates a number of factors, including conviction rates, sentencing trends, and victim satisfaction.

The study also investigates the possibility of young offenders who committed sexual offenses being rehabilitated and reintegrated into society. For a better understanding of the opportunities and difficulties involved in rehabilitating criminals under the set minimum age barrier, it looks at psychological views, treatment plans, and recidivism rates.

The research reveals gaps, difficulties, and probable inconsistencies in India's existing strategy based on the analysis of these interrelated aspects. In order to improve the harmony between justice and rehabilitation in the criminal justice system, it suggests evidence-based recommendations and prospective directions for reform.