A Study On An Empirical Examination Of Framing A Literature Reviews Perspective

Main Article Content

Rakesh Kumar Upadhyay
Prof. VD Sharma

Abstract

Framing demonstrates the cognitive practices of the consumer services in terms of associating with the financial choices. Valences can have both a positive and negative effect in behavioral economics that are suggested by the possibilities of favorable and unfavorable practices. The thematic analysis signifies the behavioral accessibility projecting ideas on energy saving services. The study is based on the systematic analysis of the factors incorporating the practices that are relative to the consumer product choices. In accordance tp that the proposed aspects are suggested to be having the values that are determined of equivalent gains. The ideologies of the literature perspective are associated with framing structure that can be constructed in various valences. Moreover, the practicing elements are essential in analyzing the neo-classical economics based on objective ideas. The themes and codes table analyses the various knowledge regarding framing practices. Framing has played a crucial part in order to comprehend diverse characteristics of behavioral economizing. The farming has influenced the process of customer preference determination. Message framing is a crucial instrument in encourage of information related to healthcare practices.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rakesh Kumar Upadhyay, & Prof. VD Sharma. (2023). A Study On An Empirical Examination Of Framing A Literature Reviews Perspective. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 6(10s(2), 1528–1536. https://doi.org/10.1234/jrtdd.v6i10s(2).2053
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Rakesh Kumar Upadhyay

Research Scholar, Department of Business Economics, Faculty of Management Studies, VBSPU Jaunpur, U.P 222003, 

Prof. VD Sharma

Professor, Department of Business Economics, Faculty of Management Studies, VBSPU Jaunpur , U.P 222003.

References

Alexander, P. A. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: The art and science of quality systematic reviews. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 6-23. Retrieved from https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1696613/document.pdf retrieved on 18th July, 2023

Amini, M., & Rahmani, A. (2023). Achieving Financial Success by Pursuing Environmental and Social Goals: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Research Agenda for Sustainable Investment. World Information Technology and Engineering Journal, 10, 1286-1293. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-020- 03685-7 retrieved on 18th July, 2023

Breslin, D., & Gatrell, C. (2023). Theorizing through literature reviews: The miner-prospector continuum. Organizational Research Methods, 26(1), 139-167. Retrieved from

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629622002183 retrieved on 18th July, 2023

Cherewka, A., & Prins, E. (2023). Adult basic education under WIOA title II implementation: An integrative literature review. Adult Education Quarterly, 73(2), 113-132. Retrieved from

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X22001160 retrieved on 18th July, 2023

Conz, E., & Magnani, G. (2020). A dynamic perspective on the resilience of firms: A systematic literature review and a framework for future research. European Management Journal, 38(3), 400-412. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X22000227 retrieved on 18th July, 2023

Czachorowski, K. V., Haskins, C., & Mansouri, M. (2023). Minding the gap between the front and back offices: A systemic analysis of the offshore oil and gas upstream supply chain for framing digital transformation. Systems Engineering. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/02683962211048201 retrieved on 18th July, 2023

Deacon, B., Laufer, M., & Schäfer, L. O. (2023). Infusing educational technologies in the heart of the university—A systematic literature review from an organisational perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(2), 441-466. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Llewellyn-Thomas/publication/349238547_Entrepreneurial_Framing_A_Literature_Review_and_Future_Research_Directions/links/60263d8fa6fdcc37a81d749c/Entrepreneurial-Framing-A-Literature-Review-and-Future-Research Directions.pdf retrieved on 18th July, 2023

Domański, J., Domagala, Z., Simmons, J. E., & Wanat, M. (2023). Terra incognita in anatomical museology–a literature review from the perspective of evidence-based care. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger, 245, 152013. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11301-021-00252-7 retrieved on 18th July, 2023

Duan, Y., Aloysius, J. A., & Mollenkopf, D. A. (2022). Communicating supply chain sustainability: transparency and framing effects. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 52(1), 68-87. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8 retrieved on 18th July, 2023

Elsbach, K. D., & van Knippenberg, D. (2020). Creating high‐impact literature reviews: An argument for ‘integrative reviews’. Journal of Management Studies, 57(6), 1277-1289. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7523 retrieved on 18th July, 2023

Gagliardi, E., Bernardini, G., Quagliarini, E., Schumacher, M., & Calvaresi, D. (2023). Characterization and future perspectives of Virtual Reality Evacuation Drills for safe built environments: A Systematic Literature Review. Safety science, 163, 106141. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8 retrieved on 18th July, 2023

Geels, F. W. (2019). Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: A review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 39, 187-201. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122003835 retrieved on 18th July, 2023

Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., & Yang, J. (2022). Distinguishing between appropriability and appropriation: A systematic review and a renewed conceptual framing. Research Policy, 51(1), 104417. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7523 retrieved on 18th July, 2023

Jensen, J. B., Pedersen, O., Lund, O., & Skovbjerg, H. M. (2022). Playful approaches to learning as a realm for the humanities in the culture of higher education: A hermeneutical literature review. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 21(2), 198- 219.

Kohtamäki, M., Rabetino, R., Parida, V., Sjödin, D., & Henneberg, S. (2022). Managing digital servitization toward smart solutions: Framing the connections between technologies, business models, and ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, 105, 253-267. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11301-021-00252-7 retrieved on 18th July, 2023

König, J., Santagata, R., Scheiner, T., Adleff, A. K., Yang, X., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Teacher noticing: A systematic literature review of conceptualizations, research designs, and findings on learning to notice. Educational Research Review, 36, 100453. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753520302241 retrieved on 18th July, 2023

Kumari, R., Verma, R., Debata, B. R., & Ting, H. (2022). A systematic literature review on the enablers of green marketing adoption: consumer perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 132852. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Llewellyn-Thomas/publication/349238547_Entrepreneurial_Framing_A_Literature_Review_and_Future_Research_Directions/links/60263d8fa6fdcc37a81d749c/Entrepreneurial-Framing-A-Literature-Review-and-Future-Research-Directions. pdf retrieved on 18th July, 2023

Lo, S. K., Lu, Q., Wang, C., Paik, H. Y., & Zhu, L. (2021). A systematic literature review on federated machine learning: From a software engineering perspective. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(5), 1-39. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-020-03685-7 retrieved on 18th July, 2023

Lode, M. L., Te Boveldt, G., Coosemans, T., & Camargo, L. R. (2022). A transition perspective on Energy Communities: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 163, 112479. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8 retrieved on 18th July, 2023

McCaig, M., Rezania, D., & Dara, R. (2023). Framing the response to IoT in agriculture: A discourse analysis. Agricultural Systems, 204, 103557. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.11354 retrieved on 18th July, 2023

Meyer, E., Welpe, I. M., & Sandner, P. G. (2022). Decentralized finance—A systematic literature review and research directions. ECIS.

Mora, L., Gerli, P., Ardito, L., & Petruzzelli, A. M. (2023). Smart city governance from an innovation management perspective: Theoretical framing, review of current practices, and future research agenda. Technovation, 123, 102717. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10796-020-10044-1 retrieved on 18th July, 2023