Analytical Comparison Of Teaching Approaches In Massive Open Online Courses

Main Article Content

Jai Devi
Neeru Rathee

Abstract

This research paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the pedagogical approaches used in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), focusing on three major platforms: Coursera, edX, and SWAYAM. The study aims to explore how these platforms structure their courses, with a specific emphasis on course duration, teaching methodologies, types of assessments, and the level of social interaction. By employing a mixed-methods approach that integrates both quantitative and qualitative data, the paper provides insights into the varied instructional designs and teaching strategies of these MOOC platforms. The research utilizes statistical tools like the Chi-squared test to examine the distribution and effectiveness of different assessment types (computer-graded, peer assessments, and courses without assessments) and to analyze the extent and nature of social interaction, as indicated by discussion posts. Findings reveal significant differences among the platforms in terms of their pedagogical approaches, with each platform showing distinct preferences in assessment types and varying degrees of facilitation of social interaction. The results of this study are crucial for educators, instructional designers, and learners in understanding the evolving landscape of online education. The comparative analysis not only highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each platform in terms of engagement and learning outcomes but also offers a guideline for future enhancements in online course delivery and design. Furthermore, the paper discusses the implications of these findings in the broader context of online education, emphasizing the need for adaptive and learner-centered pedagogies in the digital age. This research contributes to the field of online education by providing a deeper understanding of how different MOOC platforms can cater to diverse learning needs and preferences, thereby shaping the future of learning and teaching in a global, digital environment.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jai Devi, & Neeru Rathee. (2022). Analytical Comparison Of Teaching Approaches In Massive Open Online Courses. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 5(2s), 653–660. https://doi.org/10.53555/jrtdd.v5i2s.2366
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Jai Devi

Research Scholar, Department of Education, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana (India)

Neeru Rathee

Head of Department, Department of Education, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana (India)

References

Baturay, M. H. (2014). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427-433. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815018904

Capper, J. (2002). E-Learning growth and promise for the developing world. TechTrends, 46(3), 55-58.

Chen, Y. (2013). MOOC Study Group. Open Courseware in the Institutional Repository: OCW as a case study of MIT. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://ocw.mit.edu/

Du, H. S. (2014). MOOCs: A learning journey. Chinese Journal of ICT in Education, 6, 20-25.

Khalil, H., & Ebner, M. (2013). MOOCs completion rates and possible methods to improve retention- A literature review. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2013 (pp. 1305-1313). AACE.

Mahajan, G., Dutt, S., & Aulakh, P. S. (2018). MOOCs: Clark's taxonomy of MOOCs. Open Praxis, 10(2), 97-108. https://www.openpraxis.org/index.php/OpenPraxis/article/view/835

Pujar, S. M., & Bansode, S. Y. (2014). The flipped classroom: A learning model to enhance teaching learning process of degree college libraries of Mumbai. International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 4(1), 1-9.

Sandeen, C. (2013). Integrating MOOCs into traditional higher education: The emerging "MOOC 3.0" era. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 45(6), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2013.842103

Tyagi, S. (2019). MOOCs Pedagogy for outcome based education. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(3), 220-226. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1211785.pdf

Wong, J. (2015). Comparing the pedagogical orientation of MOOCs. Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 13(1),48-60. https://www.igi-global.com/article/comparing-the-pedagogical-orientation-of-moocs/132704