A Comparative Analysis Of Traditional Memorization Vs. Keyword Mnemonics In Information Retention
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative analysis focusing solely on the difference in retention after one week between traditional memorization and keyword mnemonics. Utilizing empirical data, the study aims to discern which method proves more effective in aiding information retention over a short-term period. While traditional memorization relies on repetition and association, keyword mnemonics involves creating associations between new information and familiar concepts. Through a controlled experiment, participants were exposed to both methods and subsequently tested on their retention of the material after one week. The results indicate a significant disparity in retention rates between the two approaches. By isolating the variable of retention duration and focusing solely on the impact of keyword mnemonics, this study provides valuable insights into memory enhancement techniques, offering practical implications for educators and learners identical.
Article Details
References
Agarwal, P. K., Bain, P. M., & Chamberlain, R. W. (2012). The value of applied research: Retrieval practice improves classroom learning and recommendations from a teacher, a principal, and a scientist. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 437-448.
Andreano, J. M., & Cahill, L. (2009). Sex influences on the neurobiology of learning and memory. Learning & Memory, 16(4), 248-266.
Brown, P. C., Roediger III, H. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Make it stick: The science of successful learning. Harvard University Press.
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354-380.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). Learning as a generative activity: Eight learning strategies that promote understanding. Cambridge University Press.
Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2011). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(1), 1-52.
Herlitz, A., Nilsson, L. G., & Bäckman, L. (1999). Gender differences in episodic memory. Memory & Cognition, 27(4), 707-713.
Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772-775.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. National Academies Press.
Pashler, H., Bain, P. M., Bottge, B. A., Graesser, A., Koedinger, K., McDaniel, M. A., & Metcalfe, J. (2007). Organizing instruction and study to improve student learning. Institute of Education Sciences.
Pressley, M., & Levin, J. R. (1983). Developmental constraints associated with children's use of keyword instructions for learning about text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(1), 13-23.
Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: How much is enough?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 283-302.
Roediger III, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20-27.