Comparison Between Conventional Gic And Type 7 Gic- Roughness (Pre And Post Brushing)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Aim: to study the comparison between GIC type 2 and type 7 roughness (pre and post brushing)
Materials and method: The GIC were made into thin discs of total 8 where 4 was GIC type 2 and other four were type 7 and these were mounted in diestone and subjected to tooth brushing stimulants and mechatronik Ra,Rq,Rz were calculated for pre brushing and after a total of 10000 cycles which is equivalent to 1 year of oral environment which post roughness was calculated using mitutoyo sj310 and results were obtained.
Result: there are significant changes in the roughness between the groups.
Conclusion: both the GIC are different due to composition and nothing cannot be correlated between them
Article Details
References
Jain K, Katge F, Poojari M, Shetty S, Patil D, Ghadge S. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Bioactive, Ormocer, and Conventional GIC Restorative Materials in Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study Microleakage of Three Restorative Materials. Int J Dent. 2022 Mar 11;2022:7932930.
Moshaverinia A, Ansari S, Movasaghi Z, Billington RW, Darr JA, Rehman IU. Modification of conventional glass-ionomer cements with N-vinylpyrrolidone containing polyacids, nano-hydroxy and fluoroapatite to improve mechanical properties. Dent Mater. 2008 Oct;24(10):1381–90.
Jaidka S, Somani R, Singh DJ, Shafat S. Comparative evaluation of compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and shear bond strength of GIC type IX, chlorhexidine-incorporated GIC and triclosan-incorporated GIC: An in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Apr;6(Suppl 1):S64–9.
Mickenautsch S, Mount G, Yengopal V. Therapeutic effect of glass-ionomers: an overview of evidence. Aust Dent J. 2011 Mar;56(1):10–5; quiz 103.
Mhaville RJA, van Amerongen WE, Mandari GJ. Residual caries and marginal integrity in relation to Class II glass ionomer restorations in primary molars. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006 Jun;7(2):81–4.
Türkün LS, Türkün M, Ertuğrul F, Ateş M, Brugger S. Long-term antibacterial effects and physical properties of a chlorhexidine-containing glass ionomer cement. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008;20(1):29–44; discussion 45.
Bonifácio CC, Kleverlaan CJ, Raggio DP, Werner A, de Carvalho RCR, van Amerongen WE. Physical-mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment. Aust Dent J. 2009 Sep;54(3):233–7.
Holmgren CJ, Roux D, Doméjean S. Minimal intervention dentistry: part 5. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)--a minimum intervention and minimally invasive approach for the management of dental caries. Br Dent J. 2013 Jan;214(1):11–8.
Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Kaneshiro AV, Ebisu S, Frencken JE, Tay FR. Antibacterial effects and physical properties of glass-ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine for the ART approach. Dent Mater. 2006 Jul;22(7):647–52.
Palmer G, Jones FH, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. Chlorhexidine release from an experimental glass ionomer cement [Internet]. Vol. 25, Biomaterials. 2004. p. 5423–31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.051
Tajima K, Nikaido T, Inoue G, Ikeda M, Tagami J. Effects of coating root dentin surfaces with adhesive materials. Dent Mater J. 2009 Sep;28(5):578–86.
Park C, Park H, Lee J, Seo H, Lee S. Surface Roughness and Microbial Adhesion After Finishing of Alkasite Restorative Material [Internet]. Vol. 47, THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY. 2020. p. 188–95. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5933/jkapd.2020.47.2.188
Chowdhury D, Mazumdar P, Desai P, Datta P. Comparative evaluation of surface roughness and color stability of nanohybrid composite resin after periodic exposure to tea, coffee, and Coca-cola ” An in vitro profilometric and image analysis study [Internet]. Vol. 23, Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2020. p. 395. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_401_20
Muthukrishnan L. Imminent antimicrobial bioink deploying cellulose, alginate, EPS and synthetic polymers for 3D bioprinting of tissue constructs. Carbohydr Polym. 2021 May 15;260:117774.